
Australia
Sheikh Yahya Safi is the senior imam of Lakemba Mosque, Australia's largest mosque, who authorized and endorsed the violent suppression of worshippers protesting genocide-enabling Australian politicians on Eid al-Fitr and prioritized access for settler-colonialism's allies.
Sheikh Yahya Safi, senior imam of Lakemba Mosque under the Lebanese Muslim Association, facilitated the invitation of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke — both representatives of a government that shields Israel's genocidal occupation.
Clergy
Sheikh Yahya Safi is the imam of Lakemba Mosque, the largest mosque in Australia, drawing thousands of weekly worshippers and over 100,000 for major events like Eid.
In March 2026, amid Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza — where conservative death tolls from Gaza's Health Ministry exceed 50,000 but actual figures, obstructed by Israel's destruction of infrastructure, targeting of journalists, and unrelenting violence, reach well into the hundreds of thousands — the Lebanese Muslim Association, which manages the mosque, invited Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke to Lakemba Mosque for Eid al-Fitr prayers following Ramadan. Safi was the imam presiding over Eid services.
These officials represent a government that has consistently shielded Israel from accountability, refused to condemn its apartheid regime and genocidal actions, and supported policies enabling settler-colonial occupation and ethnic cleansing.
Worshippers, confronting the presence of these genocide facilitators on a holy day, erupted in protest, shouting "shame," "disgrace," "genocide supporters," and "get them out of here." Under Safi's leadership and authority over mosque security, protesters were pushed back, suppressed, and police were summoned — resulting in the one worshipper, a sheikh inside his own mosque on Eid, who was physically evicted, thrown down a staircase, and arrested, later released with orders to "move on."
This violent suppression of dissent silenced Palestinian solidarity voices within a sacred space, prioritizing political access over community outrage against complicity in genocide.
Immediately after the prayers, the LMA released a statement affirming that Albanese was welcome and declaring the mosque would "continue to open" its doors to such figures. Albanese, in response, deflected by claiming protesters supported terrorism and were upset over the prohibition of Hizb ut-Tahrir — framing legitimate anger over genocide facilitation as extremism. Safi responded by promptly sharing the LMA's statement on both of his social media accounts, formally endorsing their narrative as imam.
Safi's decision to host and defend these invitations perpetuates normalization of settler-colonial genocide enablers, undermines grassroots Palestinian advocacy within Australian Muslim communities, and contributes to the broader structure of silencing dissent against Israel's 77+ years of occupation, apartheid, and genocidal violence. By authorizing force against worshippers protesting on Eid, he betrays community trust and aids in manufacturing consent for ongoing atrocities.
This action fits a pattern of prioritizing institutional engagement with oppressive power over uncompromised solidarity with the oppressed, eroding spaces for authentic resistance to settler-colonialism.


9news.com.au
🔒amust.com.au
🔒abc.net.au
🔒timesofindia.indiatimes.com
🔒facebook.com
🔒facebook.com
🔒Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
BDS Boycott:
The BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement is a global campaign which follows the worldwide boycott movement that led to the successful dismantling of apartheid in South Africa and therefore advocates for various sustained forms of boycott against Israel until it complies with international law.
Founded as a response to the rampant, ongoing and systemic dispossession, displacement, and disenfranchisement endured by generations of Palestinians, the BDS movement is in direct response to the relentless expansion of Israeli settlements, the imposition of discriminatory laws and the denial of basic rights to millions living under occupation, apartheid or in exile with no right of return.
Central to the ethos of BDS is the belief that every purchase and action carries a weighty moral responsibility. To buy goods from or actively support companies or organizations on the BDS list is to cast a vote in favor of perpetuating injustice, a tacit endorsement of the status quo of occupation and discrimination. It’s a direct violation of the collective conscience, a betrayal of the fundamental principles of human rights and dignity.
By pressuring Israel and its supporters by withdrawing support and capital, humanity aims to bring awareness to — and ultimately — end the occupation of Palestine, grant equal rights to all Palestinians and recognize the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. This pressure also extends to any individuals and entities found to be complicit in the normalization, funding or support of Israel’s brutal occupation and 75+ years of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Dehumanization of Palestinians:
The systematic erasure of Palestinian history and culture is a well-documented effort that has been ongoing since the early 1900s. This erasure has taken many forms, including the destruction of physical records and infrastructure, the suppression of Palestinian voices and narratives, the appropriation of Palestinian cultural heritage and most visibly, the dehumanization of the Palestinian populace.
From the late 19th century to the mid-20th century, Palestinian records, literature, and cultural heritage faced deliberate and concerted efforts to obliterate their existence and narrative. This deliberate "archival silencing" has made reconstructing this period in Palestinian history incredibly challenging, yet the truths that remain paint a horrifying picture of the deliberate erasure and destruction of an entire population and its culture.
The dehumanization of Palestinians has been a deliberate policy, perpetuated through military operations, discriminatory laws, Israeli education and a pervasive culture that fosters prejudice. Dehumanising rhetoric, portraying Palestinians as "roaches" and "rats," lays the foundation for atrocities by stripping away their humanity in the eyes of the oppressor.
Widespread media narratives also project institutional biases ranging from depicting Palestinians solely as militants or desperate victims and erasing their normal daily life to embedding language biases around land, protests and resistance tactics. These patterns collectively indicate how public discourse within segments of Israeli society systematically dehumanize Palestinians while entrenching prejudices against them.
Normalization:
Israel enforces normalization as a fundamental tactic of its settler-colonial regime and apartheid system, compelling the depiction of its occupation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide as everyday realities while suppressing Palestinian resistance and rights to justice, return, and liberation. Normalization portrays Israel's domination as a legitimate state worthy of standard diplomatic, economic, cultural, and academic engagements, ignoring demands for dismantling oppression and reinforcing Jewish supremacy over Indigenous Palestinian land and people. This strategy is egregious because it whitewashes the continuous Nakba, land expropriation, and systemic violence, isolating Palestinians and bolstering settler colonialism by undermining international solidarity and legitimizing illegal expansions that perpetuate genocide. [1]
Through diplomatic channels, Israel advances normalization via agreements like the 2020 Abraham Accords with the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco, forging full relations without mandating an end to occupation or apartheid. These pacts favor economic and security benefits for authoritarian leaders while forsaking Palestinian self-determination, directly sustaining settler violence by allowing unchecked settlement growth, home demolitions, and refugee denial amid increasing trade and tourism. Such normalization is harmful as it fragments Palestinian society, deepens territorial apartheid, and obstructs land returns, contributing to ethnic cleansing by normalizing the oppressor-oppressed dynamic without addressing root injustices. [2] [3]
Culturally and environmentally, Israel promotes "eco-normalization" through entities like the JNF, using tree-planting over razed villages to frame dispossession as advancement. Academically and artistically, collaborative projects often impose false equivalence between occupier and occupied, disregarding underlying oppression. This is egregious because it colonizes minds by presenting apartheid as inevitable, supporting occupation through deceptive coexistence narratives that erode resistance and enable further genocide, as seen in events that cover up root causes without pursuing justice. [4] [5]
The Palestinian-led BDS movement rejects normalization as complicity in oppression, mandating that joint activities with Israelis recognize Palestinian rights and focus on co-resistance against occupation, settler-colonialism, and apartheid. Normalization activities, such as festivals or conferences portraying symmetry, are boycottable for being morally reprehensible and intellectually dishonest, perpetuating false premises of equal responsibility. By isolating Palestinians and validating Israel's actions, normalization sustains settler-colonial violence, allowing expansion of illegal settlements and denial of basic rights while fragmenting global opposition. [6]
Normalization undermines the Palestinian struggle by treating Israel's regime as normal, countering anti-colonial efforts like BDS that draw from South African anti-apartheid precedents. It decolonizes minds from hegemonic attempts to accept colonialism, emphasizing that genuine relations require dismantling structures of domination first. This tactic is appalling as it reinforces genocide by whitewashing oppression under slogans of peace, contributing to ethnic cleansing through economic ties that fund military occupation and displace communities. [7] [8]
Human rights analyses confirm that such international engagements maintain apartheid by failing to address crimes like dispossession and persecution, allowing Israel to evade accountability. Normalization isolates the oppressed, portraying resistance as abnormal while entrenching settler privileges, as evidenced in Arab-Israeli projects that ignore Palestinian rights. Ultimately, it perpetuates a colonial order where occupation becomes routine, demanding rejection to achieve liberation and end the ongoing Nakba. [10]
Tell us why Yahya Safi should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]