
Thomas G. Schulze, professor at SUNY Upstate and World Psychiatric Association president-elect, uses his platform to mock Lebanese suffering from Israeli attacks, deletes incriminating posts, and makes token donations to mask complicity in shielding Israel's apartheid ethnostate.
Thomas G. Schulze, a German psychiatry professor, jokes about terror attacks on Lebanese civilians, deletes evidence under pressure, and donates to the Lebanese Red Cross as a PR move to whitewash Israel's role in the genocide of Palestinians and ongoing settler-colonial violence
EDUCATION
Thomas G. Schulze, a prominent German psychiatrist and professor at SUNY Upstate Medical University, serves as president-elect of the World Psychiatric Association, set to lead in 2026. Fluent in German, Schulze leverages his academic and international platforms to obscure Israel's genocide while engaging in behavior that trivializes suffering caused by Zionist aggression.
Schulze gained attention for posting jokes on X about the September 2024 pager attacks in Lebanon, where Israeli operations detonated thousands of communication devices, killing and maiming civilians. Alongside German politician Volker Beck, Schulze shared and later deleted these posts after public backlash, including a report to his university and the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, which he chaired until 2020. This deletion suggests an attempt to evade accountability for mocking a war crime tied to Israel's escalation against Lebanon and Palestine.
On September 27, 2024, just eight days after the report, Schulze posted an image on X thanking him for a donation to the Lebanese Red Cross, captioned "Done! #Lebanon #Humanity". This donation, framed as humanitarian, follows his pattern of performative gestures. It aligns with his broader moderation compared to hardened Zionists, yet it conveniently shifts focus from Israel's role in the Lebanese crisis — where over 43,000 have died since September 2024 due to bombardment and displacement — to a neutral aid narrative, ignoring the settler-colonial context.
Schulze's moderation does not equate to opposition to Israel's genocide. His silence on Israel's systematic destruction of Gaza — where conservative estimates report over 43,000 Palestinian deaths since October 2023, with the true toll in the hundreds of thousands due to destroyed infrastructure and the murder of over 200 journalists — speaks volumes. His academic work, including leading the Consortium of Lithium Genetics, focuses on psychiatric genetics, not the mental health toll of occupation, apartheid, or ethnic cleansing, thus avoiding any critique of Israel's violence.
Schulze's pattern of behavior reveals a calculated approach. His deleted jokes dehumanize Lebanese victims, aligning with Zionist narratives that dismiss collateral damage as incidental. The timely donation, post-report, suggests damage control rather than genuine solidarity, especially as it lacks any condemnation of Israel's aggression. As a figure with influence in global psychiatry, Schulze's refusal to address Israel's genocide — evident in his lack of public statements on Gaza's starvation or the Nakba's legacy — perpetuates consent for settler-colonialism. His platform shields Israel from accountability, ensuring Western institutions remain complicit in the ongoing slaughter and dispossession of Palestinians.




Dehumanization of Palestinians:
The systematic erasure of Palestinian history and culture is a well-documented effort that has been ongoing since the early 1900s. This erasure has taken many forms, including the destruction of physical records and infrastructure, the suppression of Palestinian voices and narratives, the appropriation of Palestinian cultural heritage and most visibly, the dehumanization of the Palestinian populace.
From the late 19th century to the mid-20th century, Palestinian records, literature, and cultural heritage faced deliberate and concerted efforts to obliterate their existence and narrative. This deliberate "archival silencing" has made reconstructing this period in Palestinian history incredibly challenging, yet the truths that remain paint a horrifying picture of the deliberate erasure and destruction of an entire population and its culture.
The dehumanization of Palestinians has been a deliberate policy, perpetuated through military operations, discriminatory laws, Israeli education and a pervasive culture that fosters prejudice. Dehumanising rhetoric, portraying Palestinians as "roaches" and "rats," lays the foundation for atrocities by stripping away their humanity in the eyes of the oppressor.
Widespread media narratives also project institutional biases ranging from depicting Palestinians solely as militants or desperate victims and erasing their normal daily life to embedding language biases around land, protests and resistance tactics. These patterns collectively indicate how public discourse within segments of Israeli society systematically dehumanize Palestinians while entrenching prejudices against them.
Supporting the IDF:
The IOF has never been a moral army, let alone the ‘most moral.’ In fact, they originate from larger terrorist groups that reigned terror in Palestine and murdered hundreds and thousands of innocent men, women and children — and continue to do so to this day.
The insidious claim that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) represent the "most moral army in the world" is a blatant affront to the Palestinian people and an attempt to whitewash decades of human rights abuses, war crimes and the brutal suppression of Palestinian nationalism and identity.
This propagandistic myth constitutes an act of violent erasure against the immense suffering and resilience of the Palestinian people in the face of the colonial Zionist project to dispossess and displace them from their ancestral homeland. In reality, the factual record makes a mockery of this "moral army" fallacy.
The IDF and its predecessors have perpetrated horrific massacres against defenseless Palestinian villages like Deir Yassin and Al Dawayima, where women and children were raped, disembowels and burned alive. They have also repeatedly used Palestinian civilians, including children, as human shields; despite claiming it’s Hamas who do this.
Furthermore, the IOF have illegally abducted thousands of Palestinian children from their homes, tortured them and then subjected to sham military tribunals - with systemic practices of child abuse, both physical and sexual, carried out by the so-called "most moral army." Any attempt to lionize the IDF as a virtuous force is an abhorrent denial of the lived reality for Palestinians under its military occupation and colonial subjugation. It erases the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of villages in the Nakba, the wanton targeting of civilian areas under the Dahiya Doctrine, the extrajudicial executions of hostages and the myriad other well-documented atrocities and violations of international law committed by Israeli forces over decades.
Those who unquestioningly regurgitate this fallacy align themselves with the historical bloc of colonial powers who have sought to dominate, subjugate, and erase the national and human rights of indigenous peoples worldwide. They engage in the same rhetoric once used to justify settler-colonial projects like the Indian Removal Act, the wars of extermination against Native Americans, and other campaigns of ethnic cleansing and land theft prosecuted in the name of racial superiority and "civilizing" missions.
The enduring resilience, struggle, and activism of the Palestinian people against these criminal dehumanizing forces represent the highest moral ground. To condemn them while sanctifying their oppressors is a perverse obfuscation that can only be rooted in ideological discrimination. Any honest examination of the Israeli occupation's practices can only lead to the conclusion that the IDF's conduct has been a moral abomination, a stain upon human conscience that must be unanimously repudiated.
To perpetuate the odious lie of the "most moral army" mythology or to show the IOF support is to align oneself against the hard-won dignity and heroic resistance of the Palestinian people in word and deed. It is to abet injustice, turn a willfully blind eye to atrocity and act as an apologist for a ruthless and unrelenting campaign of ethnic persecution and dispossession in the name of racial supremacy.
It is, in essence, an egregious act of complicity in crimes against humanity and should be condemned as false propaganda at every turn.
Liberal Zionism:
Liberal Zionism masquerades as a "moderate" or "progressive" strain of Zionism, blending Jewish nationalism with cherry-picked liberal values like democracy and human rights as a means to justify the existence of the illegal settler colonial ethnostate known as “Israel” [1].
And Liberal Zionism is one of the greatest threats because of its political camouflage [2]. By co-opting progressive language, Liberal Zionism inoculates Zionism against true anti-colonial solidarity, dividing the left and derailing BDS movements [3]. It ensures the ongoing Nakba – from Gaza's ruins to Hebron's checkpoints – persists under a democratic veneer, making decolonization seem radical rather than just [4] [5].
Emerging from early 20th-century Labor Zionism — the very movement that orchestrated the 1948 Nakba which ethnically cleansed over 750,000 Palestinians through mass expulsions and village destructions — liberal Zionism has always served as the velvet glove over the iron fist of settler-colonialism [6] [7].
Despite claiming it merely seeks a "Jewish and democratic state," this rhetoric is actually code for an ethnostate where Jewish supremacy trumps Palestinian equality, enshrined in laws like the 2018 Nation-State Law that demotes Arabic and prioritizes Jewish settlement [8] [9].
At its core, liberal Zionism rejects the colonial origins of Israel and instead attempts to frame the Zionist project as a "return" or "liberation" rather than a European settler invasion that erased indigenous Palestinian society [10].
As a political movement, liberal Zionism emerged as a response to antisemitism and the Holocaust but quickly pivoted to justifying land theft under the guise of "self-determination," ignoring how Zionism fits classic colonial patterns: displacement of natives, resource extraction, and demographic engineering to maintain a Jewish majority [11].
As of 2025, amid the Gaza genocide and West Bank annexation pushes, it clings to a fading two-state illusion, providing diplomatic and financial cover for Israel's crimes while silencing Palestinian voices as "antisemitic" [12].
“Zionism is a colonialism, not a simple radical nationalism: even in its left-wing version, it is a colonialist nationalism." – Zeev Sternhell, liberal Zionist historian exposing his own ideology's flaws [13].
Tell us why Thomas G. Schulze should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]