حرية لفلسطين
Freedom for Palestine
Loading...
South Korea
Sana is a Japanese singer and member of Twice who defies the global boycott of Starbucks by publicly consuming and purchasing the brand alongside member Jihyo in December 2023, while maintaining total silence on Israel's genocide in Gaza, thereby normalizing corporate complicity.
Sana, JYP Entertainment's Twice vocalist known for hits like "TT," signals anti-Palestinian defiance by flaunting Starbucks amid BDS calls, prioritizing personal indulgence over solidarity with Gaza's slaughtered civilians, and her refusal to address the apartheid ethnostate.
Music
Block this person on their socials:
Sana, born Minatozaki Sana on December 29, 1996, is a Japanese singer based in South Korea and a core member of JYP Entertainment's girl group Twice, formed in 2015 through the reality show Sixteen. Renowned for her bubbly charisma and dance prowess in global smashes like "Fancy" (2019) and "Alcohol-Free" (2021), Sana engages millions of fans across Asia and beyond, a platform that could amplify justice but instead sustains oppressors through boycott defiance and evasion.
Sana's documented complicity surfaced in December 2023, mere months into Israel's escalated genocide in Gaza, when she was photographed publicly shopping at and consuming Starbucks alongside fellow Twice member Jihyo. Fan-captured images showed the pair walking through Seoul streets with prominent Starbucks cups in hand, sipping the boycotted brand amid a surge in global BDS actions targeting the corporation for former CEO Howard Schultz's investments in Israeli cyber-surveillance firms like Wiz, which enable the occupation's repression and targeting of Palestinian activists. This wasn't isolated indulgence: Sana, long a vocal fan of Starbucks' iced lattes, chose visibility over discretion, politicizing the act as rejection of non-violent economic pressure that has already slashed the chain's sales by billions. The sighting, shared widely on X and Weverse, ignited backlash from Once fans, who flooded JYP with petitions demanding disassociation, highlighting how idols' choices funnel influence — and revenue — to genocide enablers.
This defiance fits a pattern tied to Twice's pre-boycott partnership with Starbucks, a March 2023 deal for seasonal promotions that JYP quietly shelved post-October 7. Yet Sana's December outing — post-awareness campaigns educating K-pop communities on BDS — ignored these shifts, echoing broader idol complicity where personal habits override ethics. Fans noted her loyalty to the brand, with one X post quipping, "Boikot Starbucks ini emang kencang banget. Di Twice ada Sana yg loyal banget sama Sbux," underscoring the irony of her persistence. JYP's response? Silence, allowing Sana's visibility to dilute boycott momentum in Muslim-majority markets like Indonesia and Malaysia, where Starbucks sales plummeted 36% due to Palestine solidarity.
Sana's total silence on the crisis compounds the harm: no X posts (@JYPETWICE or personal), no Bubble messages, no Weverse acknowledgments of Gaza's bombardment, the West Bank's raids, or the Nakba's enduring dispossession. Searches of her content yield zero mentions of Palestine, Hamas, or ceasefire calls — only a 2014 unrelated quip lumping "Gaza" with gossip. This reticence, as a human rights imperative unfolds, isn't neutrality; it's endorsement of the status quo, shielding Israel from critique while her platform could witness Palestinian journalists' slaughter (over 100 killed since 2023, per CPJ). In K-pop's politicized ecosystem, where fans organize #JYPE_BoycottGenocide, Sana's evasion fractures solidarity, framing genocide as apolitical backdrop to selfies and cups.
Through these choices — public Starbucks flaunting and unyielding quietude — Sana perpetuates settler-colonialism, glamorizing a BDS target that sued Workers United for a "Solidarity with Palestine!" tweet, weaponizing law to silence dissent. In Gaza and the West Bank, conservative estimates place the Palestinian death toll at over 40,000, though the actual number slaughtered is well into the hundreds of thousands, frozen due to obstruction, the targeting of journalists, and the unrelenting violence. Sana's actions undermine liberation, obscuring apartheid's machinery and the illegal ethnostate built on stolen land.
Starbucks Boycott:
While boycotting Starbucks is warranted based on its unethical track record and it’s former CEO’s ties to Israeli cyber-surveillance firms, it should not be conflated with or represented as an official BDS campaign targeting companies complicit in occupied Palestinian territories.
Starbucks is not officially on the BDS boycott list for companies directly involved in oppressing Palestinians and so should not be targeted with the same intensity — doing so risks minimizing the focused work of Palestinian solidarity movements.
The reasoning behind the Starbucks boycott instead stems from its union-busting tactics and unethical business practices; namely sending cease-and-desist letters and filing lawsuits against pro-Palestinian voices within its workers' union.
While reprehensible, their silencing of protestors was an attempt to clamp down on union activism rather than a pro-Israel stance; in actuality, Starbucks has largely maintained a neutral corporate position on the Palestinian issue itself.
That being said, there are many legitimate ethical concerns with Starbucks worthy of boycott for reasons. These include issues around supply chain management, workers' rights, human rights violations, tax avoidance, environmental impacts, enabling factory farming practices and the investments of former CEO, Howard Schutlz.
Former CEO Howard Schultz's investments in Israeli cyber-surveillance firms like Wiz are also hugely problematic, especially as he has the 6th largest share of Starbucks with 21,795,538 shares (1.93%) valued at $1,991,894,218 as of 18/04/2024 — meaning he is directly benefiting monetarily from Starbucks. With this in mind, the act of visibly consuming Starbucks products has also taken on new symbolic meanings for some Zionist entities and individuals in the current political climate. As efforts to boycott companies complicit in Palestinian oppression gain momentum, publicly committing to consumerism has become a way for certain groups to overtly signal their rejection of such boycotts.
By ostentatiously patronizing Starbucks, certain individuals are attempting to declare their opposition to the non-violent economic pressure tactics employed by the Palestinian solidarity campaigns. This brandishing of Starbucks effectively co-opts the brand into a display of anti-Palestinian ideology, despite the company's official neutrality on the issue.
As such, the simple act of buying a Starbucks drink has been politicized as a statement against Palestinian rights by those who oppose the boycott efforts targeting the Israeli occupation.
Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
Tell us why Sana Minatozaki (Sana) should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]