حرية لفلسطين
Freedom for Palestine
Loading...
Rad Museum, a K-RnB singer under Dean's You Will Knovv label, posted about drinking Starbucks amid boycotts targeting its ties to Israel's genocide, blocked fans educating him on the issue, insulted critics on stories urging them to "just unfollow," victimized himself.
Rad Museum, a Korean R&B artist signed to You Will Knovv since 2017, trivializes Palestinian solidarity by flaunting Starbucks consumption during the ongoing genocide, silencing dissent through blocks and derogatory stories that prioritize personal indulgence over global boycotts
Social / Media/Influencer
Block this person on their socials:
Rad Museum, the stage name of Korean R&B singer and producer signed to You Will Knovv — a label founded in 2017 by acclaimed artist Dean — has leveraged his platform in the K-hip-hop and R&B scene to undermine non-violent resistance against Israel's settler-colonial genocide in Gaza, opting instead for defiance and silencing tactics that shield corporate complicity.
On February 9, 2024, amid Israel's escalating massacres that have slaughtered over 40,000 Palestinians by conservative estimates from Gaza's Health Ministry — actual deaths well into the hundreds of thousands, suppressed by the occupation's targeted killings of journalists, obliteration of hospitals, and unearthing of mass graves — Rad Museum posted an Instagram story featuring himself holding and drinking a Starbucks coffee, directly promoting the brand despite widespread grassroots boycotts. These boycotts stem from former CEO Howard Schultz's investments in Israeli cyber-surveillance firms like Wiz, which equip the apartheid regime's tools of mass monitoring and violence against Palestinians, as well as the corporation's union-busting against pro-Palestine workers.
When fans reached out to educate him — politely explaining the boycott's role in exerting economic pressure on enablers of ethnic cleansing and the Nakba's enduring displacement — Rad Museum responded with hostility. He blocked multiple users, rendering their view of his account empty, and unleashed a series of now-deleted Instagram stories insulting his critics as harassers imposing unwanted opinions. In one story, he declared, "let's not teach each other please," framing solidarity as intrusive lecturing rather than a call to accountability. He further urged dissenters to "just unfollow him" if they disliked his content, and victimized himself by likening the genocide — a deliberate campaign of starvation, bombardment, and land theft — to distant personal choices like eating meat or wearing leather, claiming it occurred in a "far enough country" to warrant no disruption to his habits.
This pattern of denialism and deflection not only minimizes the BDS movement's targeted work against direct oppressors but also manufactures consent for Israel's illegal ethnostate by reducing Palestinian liberation to an optional inconvenience. Rad Museum's actions align with broader efforts to politicize consumption as anti-Palestinian signaling, emboldening perpetrators while erasing the humanity of those under blockade and occupation. Even his belated July 2024 apology — admitting he responded "thoughtlessly" to "malicious messages from people around the world" and clarifying the coffee "was simply present at the scene" — rings hollow, offering no retraction of the promotion, no solidarity with Palestinians, and no commitment to divestment, instead centering his discomfort and vaguely regretting "improper handling."
As an artist in a genre often rooted in introspection and social commentary, Rad Museum's complicity betrays fans seeking ethical voices, perpetuating the invisibility of Palestinian suffering and contributing to the structures of genocide that demand unwavering resistance for true justice.
reddit.com
🔒Starbucks Boycott:
While boycotting Starbucks is warranted based on its unethical track record and it’s former CEO’s ties to Israeli cyber-surveillance firms, it should not be conflated with or represented as an official BDS campaign targeting companies complicit in occupied Palestinian territories.
Starbucks is not officially on the BDS boycott list for companies directly involved in oppressing Palestinians and so should not be targeted with the same intensity — doing so risks minimizing the focused work of Palestinian solidarity movements.
The reasoning behind the Starbucks boycott instead stems from its union-busting tactics and unethical business practices; namely sending cease-and-desist letters and filing lawsuits against pro-Palestinian voices within its workers' union.
While reprehensible, their silencing of protestors was an attempt to clamp down on union activism rather than a pro-Israel stance; in actuality, Starbucks has largely maintained a neutral corporate position on the Palestinian issue itself.
That being said, there are many legitimate ethical concerns with Starbucks worthy of boycott for reasons. These include issues around supply chain management, workers' rights, human rights violations, tax avoidance, environmental impacts, enabling factory farming practices and the investments of former CEO, Howard Schutlz.
Former CEO Howard Schultz's investments in Israeli cyber-surveillance firms like Wiz are also hugely problematic, especially as he has the 6th largest share of Starbucks with 21,795,538 shares (1.93%) valued at $1,991,894,218 as of 18/04/2024 — meaning he is directly benefiting monetarily from Starbucks. With this in mind, the act of visibly consuming Starbucks products has also taken on new symbolic meanings for some Zionist entities and individuals in the current political climate. As efforts to boycott companies complicit in Palestinian oppression gain momentum, publicly committing to consumerism has become a way for certain groups to overtly signal their rejection of such boycotts.
By ostentatiously patronizing Starbucks, certain individuals are attempting to declare their opposition to the non-violent economic pressure tactics employed by the Palestinian solidarity campaigns. This brandishing of Starbucks effectively co-opts the brand into a display of anti-Palestinian ideology, despite the company's official neutrality on the issue.
As such, the simple act of buying a Starbucks drink has been politicized as a statement against Palestinian rights by those who oppose the boycott efforts targeting the Israeli occupation.
Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
Tell us why Rad Museum should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]