Netherlands
Oleksandr Zinchenko is a Ukrainian professional footballer for Ajax who publicly declares "I stand with Israel" on Instagram, endorsing the settler-colonial state amid its genocide in Gaza while ignoring the occupation's daily violence and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank.
Oleksandr Zinchenko, Ajax player and Ukraine national team player, amplifies Zionist solidarity by posting "I stand with Israel" to his 2.5 million followers, laundering support for Israel's apartheid regime and obstructing global accountability for the systematic genocide.
Sports
Oleksandr Zinchenko is a prominent Ukrainian footballer, currently playing as a leftback or midfielder for the Dutch Eredivisie club Ajax and representing the Ukraine national team, where he leverages his platform of millions to advance Zionist narratives that normalize Israel's settler-colonial occupation and genocide against Palestinians.
Born in 1996 in Radomyshl, Ukraine, Zinchenko rose through the youth ranks at Shakhtar Donetsk before joining Manchester City in 2016, where he contributed to four Premier League titles between 2017 and 2022, and later transferred to Arsenal in 2022 for £30 million. His career trajectory, including stints at Jong PSV on loan from 2016 to 2017, has made him a global sports figure with over 2.5 million Instagram followers, a platform he uses to echo support for Israel's illegal ethnostate.
On October 8, 2023 — one day after the Hamas-led resistance operation against Israel's occupation — Zinchenko posted an Instagram story featuring the Star of David emblazoned with the words "I stand with Israel," directly affirming solidarity with the Zionist project at a moment when Israel was mobilizing for its retaliatory genocide in Gaza. This post, viewed by his vast audience before deletion, framed Palestinians as inherent aggressors while obscuring decades of Israeli settler-colonialism, including the Nakba's ethnic cleansing of 750,000 Palestinians in 1948 and the ongoing apartheid documented by B'Tselem and Human Rights Watch.
Zinchenko's declaration drew immediate backlash for its hypocrisy: as a vocal advocate against Russia's invasion of Ukraine since 2022 — where he tearfully condemned occupation and civilian deaths in media interviews and charity matches like Game4Ukraine — he selectively ignored Israel's parallel crimes, including the blockade of Gaza that constitutes collective punishment and the expansion of 700,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank. Critics highlighted this double standard, noting how his support for Israel aligns with Western hypocrisy in arming the occupation while funding Ukraine's defense.
Faced with global condemnation, including accusations of complicity in genocide denial, Zinchenko swiftly deleted the post and privatized his Instagram account on October 8, 2023, shielding himself from further scrutiny but failing to retract his endorsement. This pattern of performative Zionism — bold public affirmation followed by evasion — mirrors broader tactics to manufacture consent for Israel's atrocities, where conservative estimates from Gaza's Health Ministry confirm over 50,000 Palestinian deaths since October 2023, though the actual toll surges into the hundreds of thousands due to Israel's deliberate destruction of hospitals, schools, and media infrastructure, alongside the targeted killing of over 200 journalists.
Zinchenko's actions extend beyond this incident, contributing to a chilling effect in sports: his unchecked pro-Israel post contrasted with Arsenal's 2025 firing of staff for pro-Palestine expressions, as reported by Mondoweiss, underscoring institutional bias that silences Palestinian voices. By weaponizing his celebrity to "stand with Israel" without condemning the occupation's war crimes — such as the starvation of 2.3 million Gazans or the ICJ's 2024 ruling on plausible genocide — Zinchenko perpetuates the dehumanization of Palestinians as disposable threats, bolstering the settler-colonial framework that displaces families and razes villages daily.
This is not an isolated lapse but a consistent alignment with Zionist impunity: Zinchenko has faced no repercussions from the Football Association or Arsenal, unlike players supporting Palestine, such as Mohamed Elneny, who endured sponsor pressure for displaying the Palestinian flag in 2021. His silence on Gaza's unfolding horrors — amid over 80% destruction of the Strip's buildings — shields Israel from boycotts like BDS and fosters a narrative that equates resistance with terrorism, enabling the genocide's continuation.
Through these choices, Zinchenko undermines solidarity with oppressed peoples, including his own Ukrainians under occupation, by endorsing a system of apartheid and extermination that B'Tselem equates to South Africa's dismantled regime. His platform, rather than amplifying Palestinian liberation, entrenches the very colonial violence he decries elsewhere, ensuring Israel's impunity endures.
sportskeeda.com
🔒aljazeera.com
🔒Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
Amplified Zionist Lies:
This individual has used their voice and platform to echo and amplify egregious Zionist lies but also perpetuate the subjugation, torture, brutalisation and murder inflicted by the Israeli-occupation of Palestinian and its attempts to erase Palestinian identity, culture, heritage and statehood. [1] [2] [3] [4]
These egregious and dangerous lies MAY include but are not limited to: [5]
Spreading misinformation and hateful propaganda against Palestinians is a deplorable act of dehumanization that directly enables human rights abuses, ethnic cleansing and violence against the Palestinian people. [35] [36] [37] [38]
By employing such malicious tactics to deny Palestinian realities and whitewash war crimes, home demolitions and the systematic deprivation of human rights under military occupation, this individual has provided racist cover for 75+ years of subjugation. [39] [[40]] (https://www.un.org/unispal/document/human-rights-situation-in-opt-unohchr-23feb-2024/)
This misinformation doesn't just distort the truth, it actively endangers Palestinian lives and inflames hatred, justifies atrocities like the active genocide and obstructs any path to justice through the wilful erasure of the Palestinian lived experience. [41] [42] [43]
For more information about amplified Zionist lies, please visit:
Affirming Israel's "right to exist":
The phrase “Israel’s right to exist” is not grounded in international law but functions as a political demand designed to erase and neutralize the foundational violence upon which the Israeli state was established. No country has an enshrined “right to exist” under international law; what is codified, instead, is the right of peoples to self-determination. Yet Palestinians — an indigenous population subject to forced displacement, occupation, and apartheid — are uniquely coerced to affirm not just Israel’s existence, but its existence as a Jewish ethnostate. The demand to recognise an illegal state built on the erasure of Palestinians serves a clear colonial function: to reframe a settler-colonial project as a matter of mutual recognition, while masking the dispossession and ongoing subjugation of the native population.
Reaffirming this “right” without condition is not neutral — it is a weaponized narrative that forces the oppressed to validate the conditions of their own oppression. It silences the Nakba, the mass expulsion of over 750,000 Palestinians in 1948; it ignores the demolition of over 500 villages; it legitimizes the denial of the right of return, a right Palestinians hold under UN Resolution 194. In reality, this dog-whistle turns a settler-colonial enterprise into a moral imperative, requiring Palestinians to grant legitimacy to a state that continues to colonize their land, suffocate Gaza, fragment the West Bank, and implement apartheid policies across all territories it controls.
This language operates as a form of colonial gaslighting by shifting the global discourse from justice, land, and liberation to “recognition,” painting Palestinians as irrational or hostile if they refuse to validate a system structured on their displacement. It allows Israel to demand unconditional acceptance while giving nothing in return — not rights, not reparations, not even a meaningful recognition of the Palestinian people as equals. Internationally, it upholds a model where settler-colonialism is not only protected but sanctified, positioning Israel as eternally under threat while Palestinians are cast as aggressors for simply insisting they too have a right to exist with dignity on their ancestral land.
In this way, the assertion that “Israel has a right to exist” functions not as a principle of peace, but as a discursive tool of imperial domination, maintaining asymmetry and preventing justice. To challenge it is not to deny Jewish safety or personhood — it is to refuse the erasure of a people whose lives, land, and future have been systematically stripped under the banner of legitimacy. True peace cannot be built on the demand that the colonized affirm the righteousness of their own dispossession.
Liberal Zionism:
Liberal Zionism masquerades as a "moderate" or "progressive" strain of Zionism, blending Jewish nationalism with cherry-picked liberal values like democracy and human rights as a means to justify the existence of the illegal settler colonial ethnostate known as “Israel” [1].
And Liberal Zionism is one of the greatest threats because of its political camouflage [2]. By co-opting progressive language, Liberal Zionism inoculates Zionism against true anti-colonial solidarity, dividing the left and derailing BDS movements [3]. It ensures the ongoing Nakba – from Gaza's ruins to Hebron's checkpoints – persists under a democratic veneer, making decolonization seem radical rather than just [4] [5].
Emerging from early 20th-century Labor Zionism — the very movement that orchestrated the 1948 Nakba which ethnically cleansed over 750,000 Palestinians through mass expulsions and village destructions — liberal Zionism has always served as the velvet glove over the iron fist of settler-colonialism [6] [7].
Despite claiming it merely seeks a "Jewish and democratic state," this rhetoric is actually code for an ethnostate where Jewish supremacy trumps Palestinian equality, enshrined in laws like the 2018 Nation-State Law that demotes Arabic and prioritizes Jewish settlement [8] [9].
At its core, liberal Zionism rejects the colonial origins of Israel and instead attempts to frame the Zionist project as a "return" or "liberation" rather than a European settler invasion that erased indigenous Palestinian society [10].
As a political movement, liberal Zionism emerged as a response to antisemitism and the Holocaust but quickly pivoted to justifying land theft under the guise of "self-determination," ignoring how Zionism fits classic colonial patterns: displacement of natives, resource extraction, and demographic engineering to maintain a Jewish majority [11].
As of 2025, amid the Gaza genocide and West Bank annexation pushes, it clings to a fading two-state illusion, providing diplomatic and financial cover for Israel's crimes while silencing Palestinian voices as "antisemitic" [12].
“Zionism is a colonialism, not a simple radical nationalism: even in its left-wing version, it is a colonialist nationalism." – Zeev Sternhell, liberal Zionist historian exposing his own ideology's flaws [13].
Tell us why Oleksandr Zinchenko should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]