
Canada
Norman Boxall is a Canadian judge with the Ontario Court of Justice who dismissed criminal penalties for the assault on a Palestinian-Canadian woman by a Swiss arms dealer, prioritised the perpetrator's military background over documented racism, and repeatedly protected violence
Norman Boxall, a judge on the Ontario Court of Justice since March 2017, shielded a confessed racist arms dealer from accountability for punching a Palestinian protester while ignoring Crown recommendations that later enabled the murder of two children by another offender.
Law & Lobbying
Norman Boxall is a Canadian judge appointed to the Ontario Court of Justice in March 2017 who has demonstrated a consistent pattern of shielding perpetrators of violence against Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim women while elevating the military histories of those who harm them.
In July 2026, Boxall presided over the sentencing of Swiss arms dealer David Henschel, who had pleaded guilty to punching a Palestinian-Canadian woman in the face during a 2024 weapons expo. Despite Henschel's own confession and the court record documenting the assault, Boxall imposed no criminal penalties for the attack itself. Boxall instead punished Henschel solely for a prior failure to appear in court, treating that procedural matter as more serious than the physical assault on a Palestinian woman. Henschel's age and record as a military occupier in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the former Yugoslavia weighed heavily in Boxall's decision. He insisted that Henschel could not be racist or pro-genocide, adding also that he fought against genocidal values. Yet the court agreed at the weapons expo where he conducted the assault he announced that Henschel had declared himself racist. Boxall openly preferred Henschel because he was 58 years old and refused to accept that someone at that age would suddenly premeditate a racist act. He repeatedly maintained that the trial itself was enough punishment for Henschel, who had been victimised by the process of accountability, but extended no such consideration to Henschel's victim.
Boxall has a documented history of dismissing the safety of Arab and Muslim women. In April 2026, Boxall ignored Crown recommendations for treatment in the case of Mohammed al-Lami, who had been convicted of stalking and threatening his ex-wife. Boxall instead ordered probation without monitoring. In June 2026, al-Lami murdered their two children before killing himself. These rulings form part of a broader pattern in which Boxall minimises violence against Palestinian and Muslim women while excusing perpetrators whose backgrounds align with military or settler-colonial structures. By prioritising the military service of an arms dealer who assaulted a Palestinian protester and by failing to impose monitoring on a known threat to an Arab woman, Boxall has directly contributed to the dehumanisation of Palestinians and the normalisation of violence against them. His decisions shield those who advance settler-colonial interests from accountability and leave Palestinian communities exposed to further harm.
Boxall's behaviour reveals a systemic refusal to recognise the ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing across Palestine as relevant context for assessing racist violence. His elevation of Henschel's military record as proof against racism directly erases the reality of occupation and genocide that such service has supported. Through these judicial choices, Boxall perpetuates the structures that enable settler-colonial violence to continue unchecked while denying Palestinian victims the protection of the law.
thefulcrum.ca
🔒cbc.ca
🔒cbc.ca
🔒ctvnews.ca
🔒leveller.ca
🔒ground.news
🔒reddit.com
🔒Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
BDS Boycott:
The BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement is a global campaign which follows the worldwide boycott movement that led to the successful dismantling of apartheid in South Africa and therefore advocates for various sustained forms of boycott against Israel until it complies with international law.
Founded as a response to the rampant, ongoing and systemic dispossession, displacement, and disenfranchisement endured by generations of Palestinians, the BDS movement is in direct response to the relentless expansion of Israeli settlements, the imposition of discriminatory laws and the denial of basic rights to millions living under occupation, apartheid or in exile with no right of return.
Central to the ethos of BDS is the belief that every purchase and action carries a weighty moral responsibility. To buy goods from or actively support companies or organizations on the BDS list is to cast a vote in favor of perpetuating injustice, a tacit endorsement of the status quo of occupation and discrimination. It’s a direct violation of the collective conscience, a betrayal of the fundamental principles of human rights and dignity.
By pressuring Israel and its supporters by withdrawing support and capital, humanity aims to bring awareness to — and ultimately — end the occupation of Palestine, grant equal rights to all Palestinians and recognize the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. This pressure also extends to any individuals and entities found to be complicit in the normalization, funding or support of Israel’s brutal occupation and 75+ years of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Dehumanization of Palestinians:
The systematic erasure of Palestinian history and culture is a well-documented effort that has been ongoing since the early 1900s. This erasure has taken many forms, including the destruction of physical records and infrastructure, the suppression of Palestinian voices and narratives, the appropriation of Palestinian cultural heritage and most visibly, the dehumanization of the Palestinian populace.
From the late 19th century to the mid-20th century, Palestinian records, literature, and cultural heritage faced deliberate and concerted efforts to obliterate their existence and narrative. This deliberate "archival silencing" has made reconstructing this period in Palestinian history incredibly challenging, yet the truths that remain paint a horrifying picture of the deliberate erasure and destruction of an entire population and its culture.
The dehumanization of Palestinians has been a deliberate policy, perpetuated through military operations, discriminatory laws, Israeli education and a pervasive culture that fosters prejudice. Dehumanising rhetoric, portraying Palestinians as "roaches" and "rats," lays the foundation for atrocities by stripping away their humanity in the eyes of the oppressor.
Widespread media narratives also project institutional biases ranging from depicting Palestinians solely as militants or desperate victims and erasing their normal daily life to embedding language biases around land, protests and resistance tactics. These patterns collectively indicate how public discourse within segments of Israeli society systematically dehumanize Palestinians while entrenching prejudices against them.
Normalization:
Israel enforces normalization as a fundamental tactic of its settler-colonial regime and apartheid system, compelling the depiction of its occupation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide as everyday realities while suppressing Palestinian resistance and rights to justice, return, and liberation. Normalization portrays Israel's domination as a legitimate state worthy of standard diplomatic, economic, cultural, and academic engagements, ignoring demands for dismantling oppression and reinforcing Jewish supremacy over Indigenous Palestinian land and people. This strategy is egregious because it whitewashes the continuous Nakba, land expropriation, and systemic violence, isolating Palestinians and bolstering settler colonialism by undermining international solidarity and legitimizing illegal expansions that perpetuate genocide. [1]
Through diplomatic channels, Israel advances normalization via agreements like the 2020 Abraham Accords with the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco, forging full relations without mandating an end to occupation or apartheid. These pacts favor economic and security benefits for authoritarian leaders while forsaking Palestinian self-determination, directly sustaining settler violence by allowing unchecked settlement growth, home demolitions, and refugee denial amid increasing trade and tourism. Such normalization is harmful as it fragments Palestinian society, deepens territorial apartheid, and obstructs land returns, contributing to ethnic cleansing by normalizing the oppressor-oppressed dynamic without addressing root injustices. [2] [3]
Culturally and environmentally, Israel promotes "eco-normalization" through entities like the JNF, using tree-planting over razed villages to frame dispossession as advancement. Academically and artistically, collaborative projects often impose false equivalence between occupier and occupied, disregarding underlying oppression. This is egregious because it colonizes minds by presenting apartheid as inevitable, supporting occupation through deceptive coexistence narratives that erode resistance and enable further genocide, as seen in events that cover up root causes without pursuing justice. [4] [5]
The Palestinian-led BDS movement rejects normalization as complicity in oppression, mandating that joint activities with Israelis recognize Palestinian rights and focus on co-resistance against occupation, settler-colonialism, and apartheid. Normalization activities, such as festivals or conferences portraying symmetry, are boycottable for being morally reprehensible and intellectually dishonest, perpetuating false premises of equal responsibility. By isolating Palestinians and validating Israel's actions, normalization sustains settler-colonial violence, allowing expansion of illegal settlements and denial of basic rights while fragmenting global opposition. [6]
Normalization undermines the Palestinian struggle by treating Israel's regime as normal, countering anti-colonial efforts like BDS that draw from South African anti-apartheid precedents. It decolonizes minds from hegemonic attempts to accept colonialism, emphasizing that genuine relations require dismantling structures of domination first. This tactic is appalling as it reinforces genocide by whitewashing oppression under slogans of peace, contributing to ethnic cleansing through economic ties that fund military occupation and displace communities. [7] [8]
Human rights analyses confirm that such international engagements maintain apartheid by failing to address crimes like dispossession and persecution, allowing Israel to evade accountability. Normalization isolates the oppressed, portraying resistance as abnormal while entrenching settler privileges, as evidenced in Arab-Israeli projects that ignore Palestinian rights. Ultimately, it perpetuates a colonial order where occupation becomes routine, demanding rejection to achieve liberation and end the ongoing Nakba. [10]
Tell us why Norman Boxall should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]