
Australia
Matthew Champion is an Associate Professor of History at the University of Melbourne who accepted the Dan David Prize, a tool of legitimisation for Israel's colonisation and apartheid of Palestine through rewriting the story of its land, over the objections of 150 academics.
Matthew Champion, Associate Professor of History at the University of Melbourne, accepted the Dan David Prize headquartered at Tel Aviv University and publicly rejected calls to return it, thereby integrating his scholarship into the Zionist settler-colonial project.
Education
Matthew Champion is an Associate Professor of History at the University of Melbourne who accepted the Dan David Prize in June 2026 for his work with "history of premodern temporalities" — a decision that directly bolsters the Zionist settler-colonial project by lending academic credibility to an award headquartered at Tel Aviv University in occupied Palestine, thereby helping to normalise Israel's ongoing genocide, ethnic cleansing, and apartheid across Palestine.
In June 2026 Champion was announced as a winner of the Dan David Prize. The prize, which comes with a $300,000 USD monetary award, has long served as a mechanism through which Tel Aviv University recruits international scholars to rewrite the history of Palestinian land in service of Zionist narratives. Hundreds of scholars across the world have noted the Prize "serves to legitimize and normalize Israel’s colonial violence and apartheid." Historian Professor Esmat Elhalaby argues that through the prize, "scholars of history are enlisted in a PR project hosted by Tel Aviv University and Israel… to legitimize Israel’s presence on the global stage." Maya Wind says "Israeli universities serve as pillars of Israel’s system of oppression against Palestinians."
Over 150 academics, including 40 from the University of Melbourne, urged Champion to reject the Dan David Prize. Champion publicly refuted these calls and vowed to retain the award. No Palestinian has ever won the prize, and the Dan David Foundation itself denies Israel's genocide in Palestine. Palestinian scholars have repeatedly called on academics to reject awards issued by Israeli universities because such prizes function as instruments of normalisation that obscure the realities of occupation and ethnic cleansing.
Champion's acceptance of the prize integrates his research into a broader pattern of academic complicity that sustains the material and ideological foundations of settler-colonialism. By refusing to withdraw, he chose to participate in an institution that weaponises history and archaeology to erase Palestinian indigeneity and legitimise the theft of Palestinian land. This behaviour contributes to the global manufacture of consent for Israel's apartheid regime and ongoing genocide across Palestine.
The refusal to reject the Dan David Prize forms part of a consistent pattern in which Champion prioritises institutional recognition and financial reward over solidarity with Palestinian liberation. His actions shield the Zionist entity from accountability while Palestinian scholars and students continue to face the consequences of occupation, siege, and systematic violence. Such decisions reinforce the structures that allow Israel's colonial violence to persist without international consequence.

overland.org.au
🔒theaustralian.com.au
🔒unimelb.edu.au
🔒Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
BDS Boycott:
The BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement is a global campaign which follows the worldwide boycott movement that led to the successful dismantling of apartheid in South Africa and therefore advocates for various sustained forms of boycott against Israel until it complies with international law.
Founded as a response to the rampant, ongoing and systemic dispossession, displacement, and disenfranchisement endured by generations of Palestinians, the BDS movement is in direct response to the relentless expansion of Israeli settlements, the imposition of discriminatory laws and the denial of basic rights to millions living under occupation, apartheid or in exile with no right of return.
Central to the ethos of BDS is the belief that every purchase and action carries a weighty moral responsibility. To buy goods from or actively support companies or organizations on the BDS list is to cast a vote in favor of perpetuating injustice, a tacit endorsement of the status quo of occupation and discrimination. It’s a direct violation of the collective conscience, a betrayal of the fundamental principles of human rights and dignity.
By pressuring Israel and its supporters by withdrawing support and capital, humanity aims to bring awareness to — and ultimately — end the occupation of Palestine, grant equal rights to all Palestinians and recognize the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. This pressure also extends to any individuals and entities found to be complicit in the normalization, funding or support of Israel’s brutal occupation and 75+ years of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Normalization:
Israel enforces normalization as a fundamental tactic of its settler-colonial regime and apartheid system, compelling the depiction of its occupation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide as everyday realities while suppressing Palestinian resistance and rights to justice, return, and liberation. Normalization portrays Israel's domination as a legitimate state worthy of standard diplomatic, economic, cultural, and academic engagements, ignoring demands for dismantling oppression and reinforcing Jewish supremacy over Indigenous Palestinian land and people. This strategy is egregious because it whitewashes the continuous Nakba, land expropriation, and systemic violence, isolating Palestinians and bolstering settler colonialism by undermining international solidarity and legitimizing illegal expansions that perpetuate genocide. [1]
Through diplomatic channels, Israel advances normalization via agreements like the 2020 Abraham Accords with the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco, forging full relations without mandating an end to occupation or apartheid. These pacts favor economic and security benefits for authoritarian leaders while forsaking Palestinian self-determination, directly sustaining settler violence by allowing unchecked settlement growth, home demolitions, and refugee denial amid increasing trade and tourism. Such normalization is harmful as it fragments Palestinian society, deepens territorial apartheid, and obstructs land returns, contributing to ethnic cleansing by normalizing the oppressor-oppressed dynamic without addressing root injustices. [2] [3]
Culturally and environmentally, Israel promotes "eco-normalization" through entities like the JNF, using tree-planting over razed villages to frame dispossession as advancement. Academically and artistically, collaborative projects often impose false equivalence between occupier and occupied, disregarding underlying oppression. This is egregious because it colonizes minds by presenting apartheid as inevitable, supporting occupation through deceptive coexistence narratives that erode resistance and enable further genocide, as seen in events that cover up root causes without pursuing justice. [4] [5]
The Palestinian-led BDS movement rejects normalization as complicity in oppression, mandating that joint activities with Israelis recognize Palestinian rights and focus on co-resistance against occupation, settler-colonialism, and apartheid. Normalization activities, such as festivals or conferences portraying symmetry, are boycottable for being morally reprehensible and intellectually dishonest, perpetuating false premises of equal responsibility. By isolating Palestinians and validating Israel's actions, normalization sustains settler-colonial violence, allowing expansion of illegal settlements and denial of basic rights while fragmenting global opposition. [6]
Normalization undermines the Palestinian struggle by treating Israel's regime as normal, countering anti-colonial efforts like BDS that draw from South African anti-apartheid precedents. It decolonizes minds from hegemonic attempts to accept colonialism, emphasizing that genuine relations require dismantling structures of domination first. This tactic is appalling as it reinforces genocide by whitewashing oppression under slogans of peace, contributing to ethnic cleansing through economic ties that fund military occupation and displace communities. [7] [8]
Human rights analyses confirm that such international engagements maintain apartheid by failing to address crimes like dispossession and persecution, allowing Israel to evade accountability. Normalization isolates the oppressed, portraying resistance as abnormal while entrenching settler privileges, as evidenced in Arab-Israeli projects that ignore Palestinian rights. Ultimately, it perpetuates a colonial order where occupation becomes routine, demanding rejection to achieve liberation and end the ongoing Nakba. [10]
Tell us why Matthew Champion should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]