حرية لفلسطين
Freedom for Palestine
Loading...
South Korea
Jisoo, YG Entertainment's Blackpink vocalist known for hits like "DDU-DU DDU-DU," signals anti-Palestinian defiance by flaunting Starbucks amid BDS calls, prioritizing personal promotion over solidarity with Gaza's slaughtered civilians, and her refusal to address the genocide.
Jisoo is a South Korean singer and actress in Blackpink who defies the global boycott of Starbucks by sharing an Instagram story holding a takeout cup with the caption "-11°C," while maintaining total silence on Israel's genocide in Gaza.
Music
Block this person on their socials:
Jisoo, born Kim Ji-soo on January 3, 1995, is a South Korean singer and actress who joined YG Entertainment's girl group Blackpink upon their August 2016 debut, captivating audiences with her visuals and vocals in global anthems like "Kill This Love" (2019) and "How You Like That" (2020). As a solo artist with her 2023 single "Flower" and actress in dramas like Snowdrop, Jisoo commands tens of millions of followers, a platform that could amplify liberation but instead sustains oppressors through boycott defiance and evasion.
Jisoo's documented complicity emerged on December 22, 2023 — months into Israel's escalated genocide in Gaza — when she posted and swiftly deleted an Instagram story featuring her hand clutching a Starbucks takeout cup, captioned simply "-11°C" to note the winter chill. Screenshots exploded across X and TikTok, igniting fury from Blinks and global fans aware of the BDS surge against Starbucks for former CEO Howard Schultz's investments in Israeli cyber-surveillance firms like Wiz, which facilitate the occupation's repression and targeting of Palestinian activists. This wasn't casual oversight: Jisoo, a longtime Starbucks enthusiast with prior posts blurring no logos, chose visibility during peak boycott momentum, politicizing the image as rejection of non-violent economic pressure that had already erased $11 billion from the chain's value. Backlash flooded YG with petitions and hashtags like #JisooBoycottStarbucks, accusing her of tone-deaf Zionism, yet she offered no apology or deletion explanation, allowing the post's circulation to co-opt her influence for genocide enablers.
This act fits a pattern of K-pop elite indifference, where idols like Jisoo — despite fandom education via Weverse and X — persist in brand loyalty over ethics, fracturing solidarity in Muslim-majority markets like Indonesia where Starbucks sales cratered. YG's silence, amid Blackpink's contract renewals for group activities, shielded her, but the damage amplified perceptions of corporate orchestration: Starbucks, reeling from lawsuits against Workers United's "Solidarity with Palestine!" tweet, allegedly recruited celebrities to counter boycotts, turning Jisoo's cup into unwitting hasbara.
Jisoo's unyielding silence on the crisis deepens the betrayal: no Instagram posts, no Bubble messages, no statements on Gaza's siege, West Bank demolitions, or the Nakba's dispossession since October 2023. Semantic scans of her content yield zero Palestine references, underscoring how her platform — reaching youth worldwide — could witness over 100 slain Palestinian journalists (per CPJ) but instead erases them. In K-pop's high-stakes ecosystem, where fans wage #YG_BoycottGenocide, this reticence isn't neutrality; it's endorsement, framing ethnic cleansing as apolitical fluff to selfies and seasonal sips.
Through this deleted-yet-viral flaunt and profound quietude, Jisoo perpetuates settler-colonialism, glamorizing a BDS target that weaponized law to mute dissent. In Gaza and the West Bank, conservative estimates place the Palestinian death toll at over 40,000, though the actual number slaughtered is well into the hundreds of thousands, frozen due to obstruction, the targeting of journalists, and the unrelenting violence. Jisoo's choices undermine liberation, obscuring apartheid's machinery and the illegal ethnostate built on stolen land.
ottplay.com
🔒thedailyjagran.com
🔒sinardaily.my
🔒Starbucks Boycott:
While boycotting Starbucks is warranted based on its unethical track record and it’s former CEO’s ties to Israeli cyber-surveillance firms, it should not be conflated with or represented as an official BDS campaign targeting companies complicit in occupied Palestinian territories.
Starbucks is not officially on the BDS boycott list for companies directly involved in oppressing Palestinians and so should not be targeted with the same intensity — doing so risks minimizing the focused work of Palestinian solidarity movements.
The reasoning behind the Starbucks boycott instead stems from its union-busting tactics and unethical business practices; namely sending cease-and-desist letters and filing lawsuits against pro-Palestinian voices within its workers' union.
While reprehensible, their silencing of protestors was an attempt to clamp down on union activism rather than a pro-Israel stance; in actuality, Starbucks has largely maintained a neutral corporate position on the Palestinian issue itself.
That being said, there are many legitimate ethical concerns with Starbucks worthy of boycott for reasons. These include issues around supply chain management, workers' rights, human rights violations, tax avoidance, environmental impacts, enabling factory farming practices and the investments of former CEO, Howard Schutlz.
Former CEO Howard Schultz's investments in Israeli cyber-surveillance firms like Wiz are also hugely problematic, especially as he has the 6th largest share of Starbucks with 21,795,538 shares (1.93%) valued at $1,991,894,218 as of 18/04/2024 — meaning he is directly benefiting monetarily from Starbucks. With this in mind, the act of visibly consuming Starbucks products has also taken on new symbolic meanings for some Zionist entities and individuals in the current political climate. As efforts to boycott companies complicit in Palestinian oppression gain momentum, publicly committing to consumerism has become a way for certain groups to overtly signal their rejection of such boycotts.
By ostentatiously patronizing Starbucks, certain individuals are attempting to declare their opposition to the non-violent economic pressure tactics employed by the Palestinian solidarity campaigns. This brandishing of Starbucks effectively co-opts the brand into a display of anti-Palestinian ideology, despite the company's official neutrality on the issue.
As such, the simple act of buying a Starbucks drink has been politicized as a statement against Palestinian rights by those who oppose the boycott efforts targeting the Israeli occupation.
Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
Tell us why Kim Jisoo should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]