
USA
Jay Graber is the CEO of Bluesky who enforces apartheid moderation policies that racially target and delete Palestinian accounts, silencing Gaza voices amid Israel's genocide, and perpetuating settler-colonial violence by censoring fundraising and advocacy for Palestinians.
Jay Graber, CEO of Bluesky Social, implements racist content policies that disproportionately censor pro-Palestinian voices, ban Gaza fundraisers as spam, and dismiss mass-reporting as racism, to manufacture consent for Israel's apartheid and shield it from accountability.
Business/Corporate
Jay Graber, a software engineer and digital rights activist turned CEO of the decentralized social media platform Bluesky since 2021, uses her leadership to enforce moderation practices that systematically discriminate against Palestinians, especially those documenting Israel's genocide in Gaza.
Bluesky, marketed as a progressive alternative to X (formerly Twitter), under Graber's direction applies punitive policies that result in the swift deletion of Palestinian accounts — often within minutes of creation — labeling them as "spam" for sharing fundraisers, footage of Israeli assaults, or criticisms of Zionism. This targets journalists, artists, pediatricians, and civilians from Gaza, forcing them to rebuild connections repeatedly and exposing them to further harassment without recourse.
Users report accounts suspended for pro-Palestine bios, sharing aid links, or messaging supporters, while harassers using dehumanizing rhetoric against Palestinians — portraying them as "scammers" or "threats" — face no consequences. This weaponizes false equivalences, equating legitimate advocacy with fraud to silence dissent and obscure Israel's war crimes.
In May 2025, an open letter from thousands of users highlighted these issues, noting Palestinians' unstable internet access and survival needs in Gaza, where Israel's bombardment destroys infrastructure. The letter demanded Arabic rule translations, evidence before suspensions, investigation of mass reports as racism, and fair appeals. A related petition echoed these calls, accusing Bluesky of IP-blocking and contributing to censorship that hinders Palestinian human connections.
Graber's response, via Bluesky's safety team, was a generic thread claiming commitment to hearing Gaza voices but defending suspensions for "bulk messaging" or "solicitation risks," ignoring the context of crisis. Critics, including letter authors, faced retaliation through bans, demonstrating a pattern of protecting the platform's image over marginalized users.
This behavior dehumanizes Palestinians, framing their pleas as exploitative while enabling Zionist narratives that justify settler expansion and violence. It connects to Israel's broader settler-colonial project, including the Nakba and ongoing occupation, by preventing documentation of atrocities. Conservative estimates place Gaza's death toll over 40,000, but the actual number slaughtered is well into the hundreds of thousands, stalled by Israel's targeting of journalists and civil records.
Jay Graber's dismissive leadership perpetuates this genocide by normalizing apartheid moderation, shielding Israel from scrutiny, and undermining Palestinian resistance, all while Bluesky profits from user data in an "open" ecosystem that closes doors to the oppressed.

madr.network
🔒middleeasteye.net
🔒plutopsyche.medium.com
🔒docs.google.com
🔒Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
Dehumanization of Palestinians:
The systematic erasure of Palestinian history and culture is a well-documented effort that has been ongoing since the early 1900s. This erasure has taken many forms, including the destruction of physical records and infrastructure, the suppression of Palestinian voices and narratives, the appropriation of Palestinian cultural heritage and most visibly, the dehumanization of the Palestinian populace.
From the late 19th century to the mid-20th century, Palestinian records, literature, and cultural heritage faced deliberate and concerted efforts to obliterate their existence and narrative. This deliberate "archival silencing" has made reconstructing this period in Palestinian history incredibly challenging, yet the truths that remain paint a horrifying picture of the deliberate erasure and destruction of an entire population and its culture.
The dehumanization of Palestinians has been a deliberate policy, perpetuated through military operations, discriminatory laws, Israeli education and a pervasive culture that fosters prejudice. Dehumanising rhetoric, portraying Palestinians as "roaches" and "rats," lays the foundation for atrocities by stripping away their humanity in the eyes of the oppressor.
Widespread media narratives also project institutional biases ranging from depicting Palestinians solely as militants or desperate victims and erasing their normal daily life to embedding language biases around land, protests and resistance tactics. These patterns collectively indicate how public discourse within segments of Israeli society systematically dehumanize Palestinians while entrenching prejudices against them.
Tell us why Jay Graber should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]