Gabe Saporta, musician and entrepreneur, denies Israel's genocide in Gaza, propagates a biased "both sides" narrative that equates Palestinian resistance with Israeli aggression, and weaponizes uncertainty to shield Israeli settler-colonial occupation and ethnic cleansing.
Gabe Saporta visited occupied Palestine in October 2023 amid escalating violence, deleted initial pro-Israel content, maintains a weak stance refusing to recognize genocide, and doubles down on equivocation, erasing decades of Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing.
MUSIC
Gabe Saporta exemplifies celebrity complicity in Zionist settler colonialism through his denial of Israel's genocidal actions in Gaza and his adoption of a biased narrative that dehumanizes Palestinians.
Gabe Saporta visited occupied Palestine in October 2023 with his wife Erin Fetherston during a period of intensified Israeli aggression following October 7. Gabe Saporta has consistently expressed support for Israel, stating that he believes Israel has a right to the land it is forcefully and violently occupying. Gabe Saporta draws on his Jewish heritage and past visits to Israel, describing the culture there as a "commitment to making sure there will never be a Holocaust again," which he says drew him to the country, thereby invoking Holocaust memory to justify self-protective instincts that perpetuate occupation.
Gabe Saporta made initial pro-Israel posts and reposts on social media, including potentially incorrect content during the traumatic early days after October 7, which he later deleted after reflection. Gabe Saporta apologized for any inaccurate reposts but maintained that the events of October 7 were not justified, while also condemning the subsequent bombings and displacement in Gaza as not justified. However, Gabe Saporta refuses to acknowledge the ongoing genocide in Gaza, stating, "I’m not saying it won’t or isn’t [genocide]," but insisting, "I won’t throw that word around until I am sure," even as evidence mounts of systematic starvation and denial of aid, which he agrees could lead to genocide if continued.
Gabe Saporta adopts an Israel-biased "both sides" stance, condemning the killings, bombings, and displacement of Palestinians while equating them with the actions on October 7, framing the situation as a "war" or "conflict" rather than a genocide rooted in settler colonialism. Gabe Saporta questions criticisms of his terminology, asking, "it seems like one of the criticisms I am getting is in the fact that I referred to this as a war. The response is it’s not a war because Palestine doesn’t have a military. Am I understanding that correctly?" This rhetoric erases the asymmetry of power and the 76 years of Nakba, occupation, and apartheid.
Gabe Saporta makes bare minimum sympathetic statements toward Palestinians, saying he supports their rights to freedom and self-rule, and that Israel's relentless violence is horrific. Yet, Gabe Saporta doubles down on his weak stance, hoping for peace without addressing the need to dismantle Israel's ethnostate or end the blockade and siege. Gabe Saporta's equivocation sustains consent for ongoing atrocities, where conservative estimates place Palestinian deaths at over 40,000, though the true number is well into the hundreds of thousands due to obstructed reporting, slaughtered journalists, and the frozen official counts amid the genocide.
Through his platform as a musician and entrepreneur, Gabe Saporta normalizes Zionist propaganda by prioritizing skepticism toward Palestinian narratives and inverting victimhood, aligning with efforts to silence solidarity movements.


Conflating Zionism with Judaism:
While the Jewish faith and cultural identity not only long predate and but have no inherent connection to the racist political ideology of Zionism, the modern Israeli regime has deliberately pursued an ethnic supremacist agenda rooted in Jewish ethno-religious identity — yet built upon the demolition of Palestinian homes, the theft of Palestinian lands and the generational uprooting, displacement and dehumanization of the Palestinian people at large.
The harrowing cost of human suffering, loss of life and deprivation of the most basic liberties and security has been unconscionable and now, Zionism represents an utterly deplorable ethnic supremacist ideology that has enabled unconscionable acts of violence, displacement and subjugation against the Palestinian people for almost a century.
Its real-world impacts have been nothing short of a calculated campaign of ethnic cleansing, cultural erasure and apartheid racism - a horrific legacy that cannot be decoupled from Zionism's founding vision of creating an exclusionary Jewish ethno-state through the denial of Palestinian self-determination and indigeneity.
The forced expulsion of over 700,000 Palestinians from their ancestral homes and villages during the Nakba, rendering millions stateless and exiled as refugees, was an act of premeditated ethnic purging. With the willful destruction of Palestinian property, demolition of homes, uprooting of ancient olive groves, and obliteration of cultural resources further demonstrating a systematic effort to erase Palestinian identity, history and any enduring claims to the land.
Subsequent decades have seen this brutal ethnic persecution, land confiscation and denial of human rights institutionalized through severely discriminatory policies, illegal settlements, violence by occupying forces, arbitrary detentions, torture, and most notably, systemic oppression under Israel's racist apartheid regime.
These are not mere "realities" for Palestinians who remain, but grave crimes against humanity perpetrated through Zionism's new brand of unrelenting, institutionalized cruelty. This utterly shameful legacy of calculated ethnic cleansing, apartheid governance and flagrant violations of international law is inextricably intertwined with how Zionism's racist, supremacist and anti-democratic ideology has been implemented on the ground by Israel.
Any attempt to decouple or whitewash these egregious atrocities from Zionism itself is a form of explicit denialism and complicity in oppression of the highest order. No ethnic, religious or any other group deserves an ethno-supremacist theocratic state constructed through the forcible subjugation of indigenous populations as second-class citizens stripped of all rights, dignity and humanity.
Such an abhorrent exclusionary system based on racial hierarchy is fundamentally incompatible with even the barest notion of true democracy, self-determination or universal human rights regardless of ethnicity or faith.
Statehood, sovereignty and self-determination can never legitimately emerge from such systematic violence, discrimination, forced displacement and ethnic persecution as political Zionism has perpetrated against the Palestinian population.
If a state were to arise organically through democratic processes that enshrine equality, safety and liberty for all citizens regardless of ethnicity or faith, it would have legitimacy. But any racist system of ethnic domination erected through brute force subjugation and calculated ethnic supremacy, as Zionism has done, is an egregious affront to justice and human rights that requires being dismantled - not enshrined - with a new equitable path forward established.
Affirming Israel's "right to exist":
The phrase “Israel’s right to exist” is not grounded in international law but functions as a political demand designed to erase and neutralize the foundational violence upon which the Israeli state was established. No country has an enshrined “right to exist” under international law; what is codified, instead, is the right of peoples to self-determination. Yet Palestinians — an indigenous population subject to forced displacement, occupation, and apartheid — are uniquely coerced to affirm not just Israel’s existence, but its existence as a Jewish ethnostate. The demand to recognise an illegal state built on the erasure of Palestinians serves a clear colonial function: to reframe a settler-colonial project as a matter of mutual recognition, while masking the dispossession and ongoing subjugation of the native population.
Reaffirming this “right” without condition is not neutral — it is a weaponized narrative that forces the oppressed to validate the conditions of their own oppression. It silences the Nakba, the mass expulsion of over 750,000 Palestinians in 1948; it ignores the demolition of over 500 villages; it legitimizes the denial of the right of return, a right Palestinians hold under UN Resolution 194. In reality, this dog-whistle turns a settler-colonial enterprise into a moral imperative, requiring Palestinians to grant legitimacy to a state that continues to colonize their land, suffocate Gaza, fragment the West Bank, and implement apartheid policies across all territories it controls.
This language operates as a form of colonial gaslighting by shifting the global discourse from justice, land, and liberation to “recognition,” painting Palestinians as irrational or hostile if they refuse to validate a system structured on their displacement. It allows Israel to demand unconditional acceptance while giving nothing in return — not rights, not reparations, not even a meaningful recognition of the Palestinian people as equals. Internationally, it upholds a model where settler-colonialism is not only protected but sanctified, positioning Israel as eternally under threat while Palestinians are cast as aggressors for simply insisting they too have a right to exist with dignity on their ancestral land.
In this way, the assertion that “Israel has a right to exist” functions not as a principle of peace, but as a discursive tool of imperial domination, maintaining asymmetry and preventing justice. To challenge it is not to deny Jewish safety or personhood — it is to refuse the erasure of a people whose lives, land, and future have been systematically stripped under the banner of legitimacy. True peace cannot be built on the demand that the colonized affirm the righteousness of their own dispossession.
Liberal Zionism:
Liberal Zionism masquerades as a "moderate" or "progressive" strain of Zionism, blending Jewish nationalism with cherry-picked liberal values like democracy and human rights as a means to justify the existence of the illegal settler colonial ethnostate known as “Israel” [1].
And Liberal Zionism is one of the greatest threats because of its political camouflage [2]. By co-opting progressive language, Liberal Zionism inoculates Zionism against true anti-colonial solidarity, dividing the left and derailing BDS movements [3]. It ensures the ongoing Nakba – from Gaza's ruins to Hebron's checkpoints – persists under a democratic veneer, making decolonization seem radical rather than just [4] [5].
Emerging from early 20th-century Labor Zionism — the very movement that orchestrated the 1948 Nakba which ethnically cleansed over 750,000 Palestinians through mass expulsions and village destructions — liberal Zionism has always served as the velvet glove over the iron fist of settler-colonialism [6] [7].
Despite claiming it merely seeks a "Jewish and democratic state," this rhetoric is actually code for an ethnostate where Jewish supremacy trumps Palestinian equality, enshrined in laws like the 2018 Nation-State Law that demotes Arabic and prioritizes Jewish settlement [8] [9].
At its core, liberal Zionism rejects the colonial origins of Israel and instead attempts to frame the Zionist project as a "return" or "liberation" rather than a European settler invasion that erased indigenous Palestinian society [10].
As a political movement, liberal Zionism emerged as a response to antisemitism and the Holocaust but quickly pivoted to justifying land theft under the guise of "self-determination," ignoring how Zionism fits classic colonial patterns: displacement of natives, resource extraction, and demographic engineering to maintain a Jewish majority [11].
As of 2025, amid the Gaza genocide and West Bank annexation pushes, it clings to a fading two-state illusion, providing diplomatic and financial cover for Israel's crimes while silencing Palestinian voices as "antisemitic" [12].
“Zionism is a colonialism, not a simple radical nationalism: even in its left-wing version, it is a colonialist nationalism." – Zeev Sternhell, liberal Zionist historian exposing his own ideology's flaws [13].
Tell us why Gabe Saporta should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]