
Mexico
Alessandra Rojo de la Vega, mayor of Cuauhtémoc, normalized ties with Israel's settler-colonial project via a 2018 "dream" trip and a 2025 Madrid visit funded by ultra-right Fundación Internacional para la Libertad to meet Isabel Díaz Ayuso, a defender of Israel's genocide
As Cuauhtémoc's mayor and 2030 presidential hopeful, Alessandra Rojo de la Vega has forged alliances with far-right enablers of Palestinian erasure, from tourist pilgrimages to Israel to meeting with Ayuso — whose policies suppress pro-Palestine voices.
Politics
Alessandra Rojo de la Vega, a Mexican politician, businesswoman, and self-styled feminist activist elected mayor of Cuauhtémoc borough in Mexico City in 2024, has positioned herself as a bridge between Latin American politics and far-right networks that prop up Israel's 77-year settler-colonial occupation and blockade of Palestine.
Amid Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza — where conservative estimates confirm over 40,000 Palestinian deaths but the true toll, including indirect casualties from starvation and disease, surges well into the hundreds of thousands — Rojo's actions lend legitimacy to the apartheid state's violence by cultivating personal and ideological affinities with its defenders.
In April 2018, Rojo traveled to Israel for what she described as a long-dreamed leisure visit, posting effusively on X (formerly Twitter) about "charging energy" in a land "full of history in every corner" and "Holy Land for many people with different religions." This romanticized portrayal erases the Nakba's legacy of Palestinian dispossession and frames the Zionist entity as a neutral spiritual beacon, ignoring its role in the subjugation of 5 million Palestinians under military rule.
Such tourism, often subsidized or promoted by Israeli state apparatuses, serves as soft propaganda to humanize the occupier while dehumanizing the occupied, aligning with global efforts to whitewash 75 years of ethnic cleansing and land theft.
More overtly political was her August 2025 trip to Madrid, fully funded by the Fundación Internacional para la Libertad (FIL), an ultra-right outfit tied to billionaire Ricardo Salinas Pliego, a vocal critic of Mexico's left-wing government and promoter of neoliberal ideologies that echo Zionist economic dominance models.
Officially attending a forum of Latin American mayors, Rojo's itinerary centered on a high-profile meeting with Isabel Díaz Ayuso, president of the Madrid region and a leading figure in Spain's far-right Partido Popular (PP).
Ayuso, a fervent Israel ally, has vocally backed its "right to defend itself" post-October 7, 2023, including during the ensuing genocide that has razed Gaza's infrastructure and slaughtered civilians en masse.
Under her administration, Madrid banned pro-Palestine expressions in schools, deeming discussions of the Gaza "conflict" inappropriate for classrooms — a move that stifles education on Palestinian resistance and reinforces the narrative of Israeli victimhood.
Ayuso's policies, including opposition to arms embargoes on Israel, also directly enable the subjugation of Palestinians by suppressing solidarity in Europe.
The FIL's backing underscores the trip's ideological bent: the foundation, which champions "free markets" and "individual freedom" as bulwarks against "extremism," has published defenses of Israel's October 2023 military response, framing Theodor Herzl's Zionist vision as a bulwark against "criminal attacks" by Palestinians while omitting the context of occupation-fueled despair.
By accepting such patronage, Rojo not only accesses far-right networks for her nascent 2030 presidential bid — positioning herself as "La Resistencia" against Mexico's progressive tide — but also tacitly endorses the conflation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism, a tactic to silence Palestinian allies worldwide.
Despite a recent retweet amplifying President Claudia Sheinbaum's demand to "stop the genocide in Gaza," Rojo's pattern prioritizes proximity to genocide enablers over substantive solidarity, perpetuating the colonial logic that normalizes Israel's violence against a people enduring blockade, bombardment, and erasure.
In a Mexico historically supportive of Palestinian self-determination, her maneuvers risk dragging national politics into the orbit of those who dehumanize the slaughtered and displaced.

polemon.mx
🔒Visited Israel or Supported 'Birthright' Trips:
By visiting Israel, individuals actively endorse and support a regime built on systemic oppression and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians through settler colonial terrorism. These visitors are complicit in legitimizing and normalizing a brutal apartheid system recognized and condemned by numerous international bodies, including the United Nations, the ICJ, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch. [1] [2] [3]
Visitors to Israel tacitly approve severe restrictions on Palestinian movement, land confiscations, home demolitions, and the devastating blockade on Gaza, which has created catastrophic humanitarian conditions. These are not mere allegations but documented realities. The apartheid system privileges Israeli settlers while subjecting Palestinians to systemic discrimination and violence, with segregated roads, military checkpoints, and a separation barrier that fragments Palestinian communities and restricts their freedom. [4] [5] [6]
Tourism economically supports the state, indirectly funding the military occupation and the infrastructure of apartheid, including illegal settlements and state violence. Without acknowledging or engaging with the Palestinian experience, visitors normalize and legitimize these oppressive practices. [7] The financial impact of tourism cannot be understated. [8] Visitors who spend money in Israel bolster the systems of oppression that deny Palestinians their basic human rights. This financial support funds the Israeli military and infrastructure supporting illegal settlements. [9]
Programs like Birthright trips further legitimize the subjugation of Palestinians by promoting a one-sided narrative that erases the realities of occupation and apartheid, falsely presenting Israel as a safe and welcoming homeland for Jews while ignoring Palestinian suffering and dispossession. [10] [11] [12]
Visitors to Israel without a critical perspective are complicit in the violence and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. They lend credibility to a regime widely condemned for its discriminatory practices and human rights violations. By choosing to visit Israel, these individuals endorse a state that systematically violates international law and human rights, contributing to the ongoing suffering and dispossession of the Palestinian people.
Further reading:
Liberal Zionism:
Liberal Zionism masquerades as a "moderate" or "progressive" strain of Zionism, blending Jewish nationalism with cherry-picked liberal values like democracy and human rights as a means to justify the existence of the illegal settler colonial ethnostate known as “Israel” [1].
And Liberal Zionism is one of the greatest threats because of its political camouflage [2]. By co-opting progressive language, Liberal Zionism inoculates Zionism against true anti-colonial solidarity, dividing the left and derailing BDS movements [3]. It ensures the ongoing Nakba – from Gaza's ruins to Hebron's checkpoints – persists under a democratic veneer, making decolonization seem radical rather than just [4] [5].
Emerging from early 20th-century Labor Zionism — the very movement that orchestrated the 1948 Nakba which ethnically cleansed over 750,000 Palestinians through mass expulsions and village destructions — liberal Zionism has always served as the velvet glove over the iron fist of settler-colonialism [6] [7].
Despite claiming it merely seeks a "Jewish and democratic state," this rhetoric is actually code for an ethnostate where Jewish supremacy trumps Palestinian equality, enshrined in laws like the 2018 Nation-State Law that demotes Arabic and prioritizes Jewish settlement [8] [9].
At its core, liberal Zionism rejects the colonial origins of Israel and instead attempts to frame the Zionist project as a "return" or "liberation" rather than a European settler invasion that erased indigenous Palestinian society [10].
As a political movement, liberal Zionism emerged as a response to antisemitism and the Holocaust but quickly pivoted to justifying land theft under the guise of "self-determination," ignoring how Zionism fits classic colonial patterns: displacement of natives, resource extraction, and demographic engineering to maintain a Jewish majority [11].
As of 2025, amid the Gaza genocide and West Bank annexation pushes, it clings to a fading two-state illusion, providing diplomatic and financial cover for Israel's crimes while silencing Palestinian voices as "antisemitic" [12].
“Zionism is a colonialism, not a simple radical nationalism: even in its left-wing version, it is a colonialist nationalism." – Zeev Sternhell, liberal Zionist historian exposing his own ideology's flaws [13].
Tell us why Alessandra Rojo de la Vega should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]